Skip to main content

Christian Values in Government

A friend of mine regularly posts anti-Christian statements on his Facebook feed.  I don’t always like his tone, but I find that I agree with his feelings more often then I wished.  Sometimes I want to reach out and let him know that we are not all like that, but I know that he is just venting emotion from being wounded by the church.  He recently posted something that got under my skin a little though.  I needed to spend some time thinking about it.

Basically, his point was that it is unethical or inappropriate for someone to push their Christian values onto him through the governmental process.
 
On the surface I kind of get that…separation of church and state right?

Well there is a problem: how are a Christian’s values less important than a non-Christian’s? Do we simply place our values to the side because of who we are?  Let the seculars declare the values and trust that theirs will be more fair?  The whole point of a democratic system is so that the majority of people who want something done can have it that way.  If there are more Christians the law will reflect Christian values, if more people are secular then the law would reflect secular values.

I know, the idea is that it should simply be the values that are only derived from the faith that should be set aside, but how do you really do that, and where else do values come from?

Values can come from our culture or society, our opinions, or our faith.

If we only focus on the values that our culture/society present then we cannot change or grow as a country.  Slavery was once the norm and our society said it was good.  If people had not fought against societal norms, it would still exist.

If we use our opinions as individuals then we will only look out for ourselves.  Someone who beats his wife may say that he believes he is doing right by teaching her a lesson.  If we believe that each person has their own truth then who are we to tell him he is wrong?

I am not ignorant to the fact that basing our values on our faith can have the same impact.  In fact, each of the examples above have been argued for from the scriptures. 


What I am saying is: where else do we get our values?  Is it not a balance of these three? In the tension of these three approaches we find progress as a nation.  Each approach has led to progress at some point.  I wonder if there is another option.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Death Will Lose it's Sting

Our reading from the Narrative Lectionary this week is 1 Corinthians 15:51-57. In these verses, Paul reveals a mystery, that in the end some will be transformed, given a new body, instead of facing death.  In other words death is not one of life's two certain terms.  It seems taxes may be the only guarantee.   "...in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except  death and taxes ." - Benjamin Franklin. Ok, all jokes aside, these verses are difficult to read.  Paul looks forward to a time when death will have no victory, it will have lost its sting.  But today, we are in the middle of a pandemic, surrounded by death.  Many are scared for their lives, or their loved ones, and too many have already been lost.  Death does not seem to have lost its sting at all, it feels as if it is closing in. When I worked in wilderness therapy I remember holding a child who was desperately trying to kill himself.  We cried together as he struggled to end it, and I struggled

The Return Threshold

  As we come near the end of our weekly series on the Hero's Journey, today we will cover "The Return Threshold".  In this stage, the Hero has succeeded in their quest and now they are coming back to their old world.  Joseph Campbell calls this the "ordinary world".   The return to the ordinary world usually includes some type of challenge.  Sometimes an enemy must be challenged, but sometimes the enemy is the ordinary world itself.  As we have followed the hero's journey we have seen the hero change, what was once important is no longer important.  While the hero has changed, the ordinary world has not.  The ordinary world holds values that the returning hero has abandoned for something greater.  This can cause tension as the hero tries to return as a changed person. In the Lord of the Rings trilogy, we see the Hobbits finally return to their home in the Shire.  Unfortunately in their absence Saruman and his orcs have taken over the Shire and must be defeat

Master of Two Worlds

  This week we come to the second to last stage of the Hero's Journey.  Campbell called this stage "The Master of Two Worlds".  In this stage, the hero tries to integrate what they learned and gained on their journey with their old "ordinary" world.   Albert Einstein once said, "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."  This explains the challenge the hero must face in this stage.  All that they learned and gained must be fully mastered and the test of this mastery is being able to use it in the ordinary world.  They must simplify it so that the uninitiated can benefit from it, just as Einstein encouraged the mastery of complex ideas into simple explanations.   In the Star Wars Trilogy, this stage happens off-screen after the film is over, but before the new movie begins.  We learn in the newest trilogy that Luke created a school for Jedi, taking the wisdom he gained from his journey and sharing it with others.  In